ESPN’s Bill Connelly produced an article earlier this week on the most significant “ifs” for each of the top team’s chances of a championship run. Connelly listed 4 “ifs” for Notre Dame missed the mark both in terms of the details and the big picture.
Before diving too deep into this, I will say doing a deep dive like this on so many teams is a challenging endeavor given all the intricacies of each roster. That said, the Notre Dame portion of this analysis makes it clear that it was really just based on looking at a stat sheet and depth chart.
Let’s start by taking a look at the four ifs Connelly laid out for Notre Dame.
- A new receiving corps clicks
- A star running back emerges from a crowded race
- Young DBs play like veterans
- The Irish overcome a lack of beef
Before going into the details, it’s almost shocking that “Ian Book taking a big step forward” isn’t listed as one of the ifs. Book had a great statistical year in 2019, but he had a rough first half of the season. He had the ball in his hands on the road at Georgia with a chance to win the game late and came up short. Then he had one of the worst games of his Irish career against Michigan. After his game-winning drive against Virginia Tech, however, he was a different player.
All that said, if Book doesn’t elevate his game in 2020, Notre Dame does not have a chance at making a title run. If Book plays as he did versus Georgia against Clemson in November, Notre Dame loses that game. If he plays as he did against Michigan when Notre Dame takes on Wisconsin, the Irish likely lose that game too.
There are signs that we haven’t seen the best of Ian Book yet and that he has the potential to be an elite quarterback, but he will need to take that step forward for any chance at a title run in 2020. He is closer to that than some Notre Dame fans think too, but again, to me, that is easily the biggest if for Notre Dame to make a title run.
When it comes to needing the new receiving corps to click, that is undoubtedly true, but the player who holds the key to that – Kevin Austin – wasn’t even mentioned by ESPN. If Austin doesn’t play to the level that most insiders close to the program think he can, the receiving corps doesn’t have the chance to be elite enough to propel a title run. Bennett Skowronek can be a good reliable option, Braden Lenzy showed he could be a game-breaker already, Lawrence Keys has flashed to a lesser extent, and Jordan Johnson could play early. All that said, Austin represents the one receiver on the roster with the potential to be a legit, top tier #1 target.
Connelly was right about the running back rotation. It’s the most significant question mark of the entire offense right now. Some of the deficiencies here can be masked with elite play from Book, but Notre Dame needs multiple backs to develop in camp because we are almost certainly looking at a committee in 2020. One name to watch that wasn’t mentioned by ESPN, however, is Kyren Williams.
When it comes to the secondary, it was surprising to read, “while veterans like corner TaRiq Bracy and NC State transfer Nick McCloud could be ready for larger roles, success will be determined by how many blue-chippers from the 2019 class — sophomore Kyle Hamilton and redshirt freshmen KJ Wallace, Litchfield Ajavon, Isaiah Rutherford, Cam Hart — look the part early in their careers.”
While McCloud is not guaranteed to start, Bracy is going to start, and Shaun Crawford will play a huge role as well. At safety, Houston Griffith and Ohio State graduate transfer Isaiah Pryor are going to be significant factors. Notre Dame will need those sophomore defensive backs for depth, but outside of Hamilton, it’s likely none of the other sophomores emerge from camp in starting roles.
Notre Dame’s “lack of beef” is a legit concern as well. Notre Dame doesn’t have a Louis Nix on the roster, but the depth on the interior of the defensive line is better than it was a year ago. Myron Tagovailoa-Amosa and Kurt Hinish return as starters. Jayson Ademilola is entering his junior year and could be ready for a breakout season. Jacob Lacey played more as a freshman than anyone would have liked, and that experience will serve him well in 2020. And Ja’Mion Franklin will be almost two years entirely removed from a scary calf injury that limited his preparedness for the 2019 season from a weight training perspective. Add all of that up, and Notre Dame’s interior defensive line shouldn’t be a major concern.
One team that might press that defensive line though, is Wisconsin. The Badgers always have a top-notch running attack, and they could put pressure on Notre Dame’s depth.
One other omission from this “if” list is new offensive coordinator Tommy Rees. Brian Kelly placed a lot of trust into a 27-year-old, first-time offensive coordinator this off-season. There is a lot of reasons to believe that faith will pay off and that it could help get the most out of Book, but that is still a big wildcard for Notre Dame in 2020 – especially when you consider that Rees has to go head to head with Clemson defensive coordinator Brent Venables in November.
I still keep coming back to the biggest “if” for Notre Dame being Ian Book, though. Notre Dame needs Book to be much better in big games in 2020 than he was in 2019 or the 2018 Playoffs. If he’s not, Notre Dame will probably lose at least two regular-season games again this year and miss the playoffs. If he elevates his game, and there is reason to think he will, then the sky is the limit for this team.
Good article. It is up to Book to improve, and find someone who can run the football. Otherwise, another Ok. Year with a mediocre bowl.i hope to be proven wrong.
1. Don’t worry Sean – you will be.
2. If you remember Frank, elevating Coach Lea to DC was considered a “risk” by many on this site. That worked out pretty well…so maybe BK and his staff and the team are going to be right again…this time at OC.
3. As for Ian Book, he will leave ND with a bushel full of records. And if ESPN was pretty much just looking at stats – that would explain the omission of Book from their need to improve list. It’s a shame that our own fans don’t take a look at his stats once in awhile. Nonetheless, Frank is right about improvement in really big games…but that could be said about the entire team (at least if you are looking at Michigan last year and Clemson in the 2018 playoffs. And the coaching staff didn’t seem real swift in those two games either. As we used to say it: we win as a team and we lose as a team.
BGC ’77 ’82
10-2 or 9-3 this season. Lack of practice time together due to covid-19 and the replacement of all the skill-position players a spot in the playoffs is highly unlikely
Why would anyone pay attention to anything ESPN has to say about college football? I haven’t read the article but will venture a guess that it lauds everything SEC and everything else is second-best. Did I miss anything? Who even watches ESPN any more? Fox Sports eats their lunch and then takes their lunch money. ESPN? You’re kidding. right?
Nice article, I think you are absolutely right. If anything, maybe it would be a nice combination of Ian Book and the offensive line raising their level of performance, together. Maybe if the O-Line can block a little bit better, then Book can hang in the pocket and concentrate. They have good enough RBs, maybe not game game-breakers other than young Chris, but adequate. Once again, O-Line factors into that as well. Everything is integral. The one thing is worrying about receivers which seems to be an every year worry. Guys will step up. People also keep forgetting about Javonne McKinley, I think he can be of great service. I would of rather seen Eric Kuhmar instead of Bennet, but I am not the Coach. Time will tell…
Maybe, I will prove wrong here but I think Notredame will be pretty good on defense and special teams. The key is can they be great on offense. In these big games against really good offenses their going to put up points on you. Sso you have to be able to outside ore them. Look at LSU their defense gave up a lot of yards and points but their offense outscored everybody. Texas scored 38. Vanderbilt scored 37. Mississippi scored 42. Alabama scored 41. Florida and Clemson scored 28 and 25